MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, much easier to write, easier to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students will change their advanced schooling course while at uni….
Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a combined group instead of individually. Would you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has many advantages
Elements of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some individuals genuinely believe that children have to do organised activities in their free time while some believe that children should be able to do what they need to complete within their leisure time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it could be unfair to the minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to get
-furthermore studies also show that the mind operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many people say that globalisation and also the growing wide range of multinational companies have a effect that is negative environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. From what extent do you agree or disagree? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your role.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…
Scientists genuinely believe that so that you can protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy within their lives that are daily. However, most people have not changed the way they live. How come you think many people never have taken individual action? What might be done to cause them to become do something?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or we do your essays directly facing them
– Tragedy associated with the commons
– Collective problem – more straightforward to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could possibly be done to encourage them to take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……
Some genuinely believe that could be the responsibility of men and women to manage the environmental surroundings. Others say it is the national government that will take care of this environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should look after the environmental surroundings because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with your wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Government should care for environmental surroundings because:
They usually have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians of this country, which means that collectively they are guardians regarding the earth… although not true the truth is
Both should really be doing more!
In lots of countries small shops and town centers are getting away from business, because individuals have a tendency to drive to your large out-of-town stores. This leads to a rise in car use, and in addition it means that people without cars have limited usage of stores that are out-of-town. Do you consider features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?